1. Front

 

Front Cover:

Space photo from NASA – http://hubblesite.org/gallery/album/

Title message is adapted From

He that hath ears to hear, let him hear [Bible, Matthew:11-15]. If you prepare the ears, you will hear.

O, I listen all the time, at the deepest door of my heart. Rabindranath Tagore, Nobel Laureate in literature (1913). [Ami Kan Pete, Tagore]

 

The book Soul Theory is free. You can download it free in many formats.

PDF: download from anyone, both have the same file.

WordPress Site:  28April2018-SoulTheory
http://www.academia.edu/8587620/Soul_Theory_A_Book

EPUB:
https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/491282

520 comments

  1. “There is no God. God is an imaginary Being. There should be no classes/castes. We should have classless society. There is no race. Race is a social construct. There is no gender. Gender is a social construct. Stop listening to your parents. Listen to media and postmodern sophists. Obey and consume. Traditions are for backward people. You should become “modern”. We need to progress. There is no objective reality. Live your myth.”

    This is the post-modernist aka post-truth model. Where does it lead? Theft, poverty, lawlessness, immorality, sickness both mental and physical and hopelessness. Till the complete destruction. And after the complete destruction, a handful of men just like Noah will stand on a tree and will scream together “Yes, the Mystery Babylon has fallen, indeed it has fallen”…

    Like

    1. It seems that the article has not been published in any peer reviewed journal. Even though I personally do not believe in the peer review process, but the process enhances the quality of a paper’s presentation.

      Everybody is working for his own individual destiny, which is linked to the global destiny of the universe. Everybody is trying to survive in their own way, in this money-based economy. It will give me a lot of pain to stop or interfere in their efforts.

      I assume you are not the author of the paper. If you are defending the paper and know the content thoroughly, then I may try. But still why would you want me to do that?

      Like

    1. There are many levels of seer yogis on the yogi scale. Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, if they exist, are yogis at level zero (0), the highest point in the scale. Ram of Ramayan period, and Krishna of Mahabhart period are seer yogis also at level zero. The authors of those books were also seer yogis of level zero. People say no such seer yogis were born at level zero after Mahabharat time. However, all humans are yogis, I am probably at level 100, the lowest point in the yogi scale. Most people are between ranges 90 to 100. Cheiro was such a yogi probably at level 70. The book has some examples in the range of 70-80, etc. These numbers are just random guesses.

      Like

        1. “I left a comment a couple of days ago. What happened?” – I deleted that comment, and mentioned so, in reply. It was outside the aims and scope of the book.

          Like

            1. “Anyway, did you agree with it?” – I did not read them carefully. It was very painful for me to read. The book says there are no good or bad things in nature, because we do not have freewill, and everything is controlled by destiny. So when I found many words, sentences, not complying, I stopped reading them. Moreover, the book does not talk about religions or any specific religion. Somehow I thought later, that you did not write them, you probably got them from somewhere. Since somebody wrote them, they are part of destiny, and may happen in future, you never know. You can only trust a seer yogi with confidence.

              Like

              1. Religion is just a part of culture just like art.

                If you feel pleasure it is a good thing. If you feel pain it is a bad thing. If you feel neither pleasure nor pain then it is a neutral thing.

                You seem to know about religions. All that I have written is from Christian and Islamic eschatology and also from Albert Pike’s letters.

                You say that in the Vedas everything that have existed and will exist is there. Do the Vedas talk about ISIS, nazism and communism? If yes, then give me some quotes.

                Do the Vedas talk about the prince of darkness that we Christians call the final antichrist? Do the Vedas talk about the five races of humanity (red, brown, black, white, yellow)? Was Manu a red, brown, black, white or yellow man? What was his ethnicity? Was it only one Manu or more? (these are questions that I have for 5 years)

                What will happen to India also? Will there be a war with Pakistan? Will Kashmiris and other separatists take up arms? What do yogis say about this?

                Like

  2. If you say that Infinity doesn’t exist then you have to prove it. You have to prove how everything in the universe is finite. I mean everything.

    The emblem of Infinity is the cycle. The cycle has no beginning and no end. It goes on and on. If you believe in cycles and periodicity then you must accept Infinity.

    Numbers are real. Mathematics are real. Mathematics is the language of the universe. Pythagoras figured it out. Aryabhatta also.

    Ayn Rand and her individualist ideology is far far from truth.

    I will say it again. Not every Christian believes the same things. So there is no Christian definition. There are many definitions. And no, neither religion nor money are wrong. How they are used is wrong.

    Like

    1. Somehow I missed one of your old comments, dated May 09 2019, 10:52 AM. I thought your this comment has an important point for other readers also.

      Nature is defined by an important law – Birth and death for every object in the universe. Therefore for every event there is a start time and an end time. Thus time is always finite. Of course mass and volume of every object are also finite. Thus every cycle has a start point and an end point. Moreover in nature there is no circle, because everything is continuously moving.

      Like

      1. The circle is the perfect geometric pattern. The cycle has no beginning and no end. If you don’t agree with infinity then you don’t agree with eternal recurrence.

        Like

        1. “The circle is the perfect geometric pattern.” – Yes, it is a perfect pattern on paper and pencil. But there is no such pattern in nature.

          “If you don’t agree with infinity then you don’t agree with eternal recurrence.” – Every gross body has a subtle body, which is an object of nature. Therefore there is a death time for that subtle body also. When the subtle body dies it cannot reincarnate any more. Thus for that subtle body there will be no more eternal recurrence.

          Like

          1. The circle is everything in nature. Look at the shape of the earth for example.

            There is not only gross body and subtle body but myriads of bodies. And every body gets rebirth because every body is mortal, with birth and death. Only the Highest Principle is eternal.

            Like

            1. “Look at the shape of the earth for example.” – No, earth is roughly an ellipsoid, that means an ellipse rotated around the major axis. But even that is not correct; it has many mountains and valleys all over the world. There is no smooth surface anywhere on earth.

              “… but myriads of bodies.” – All bodies have a subtle body. The soul creates the subtle body first and then the subtle body creates the gross body. Take a look at the soul theory chapter (Chapter 10) for more details on the subtle body and the way it creates the gross body. Once the subtle body dies, after probably several kalpas (1 kalpa is, probably, 8.6 billion years), the soul cannot reincarnate anymore. The soul is eternal, never dies, and never takes birth. Only subtle body and gross bodies are mortal.

              Like

              1. “No, earth is roughly an ellipsoid, that means an ellipse rotated around the major axis. But even that is not correct; it has many mountains and valleys all over the world. There is no smooth surface anywhere on earth.”

                Yes you are right. Ellipsoids are still circles but not perfect.

                “All bodies have a subtle body. The soul creates the subtle body first and then the subtle body creates the gross body. Take a look at the soul theory chapter (Chapter 10) for more details on the subtle body and the way it creates the gross body. Once the subtle body dies, after probably several kalpas (1 kalpa is, probably, 8.6 billion years), the soul cannot reincarnate anymore. The soul is eternal, never dies, and never takes birth. Only subtle body and gross bodies are mortal.”

                You are talking about the astral body. There are myriads of other dimensions and therefore myriads of other bodies. As I have said before, reality is multi-dimensional, not bi-dimensional like most religions say.

                Buddhists have kalpas that last for trillions of years so as I have said everything is in a circle within a circle.

                But you haven’t answered me a question. Since you believe that everything is predestined, what will happen in the near future?

                Like

                1. Suppose Mr. X was born in city C1 of nation N1 at time T1. In next life he takes birth at C2, N2, and T2. Where is the circle here? Things can be lot more complex when you consider the universe. At time T1 the sun was under the star S1, and at time T2 the sun was under the star S2. Then where is your circle again?

                  Like

                    1. “Since you believe that everything is predestined, what will happen in the near future?” – I am not a seer yogi. Only a seer yogi can tell the future or the truth.

                      Like

  3. “You can see that you do not have the answer. You do not recognize that you have an assumption. You think you can do something without any reasons. That is you are saying: reason-action, cause-effect, sow-reap, action-reaction, etc., are meaningless. You will always fail to provide rationality on every subject you take, if you believe in freewill or God etc. This is probably the number seventh subject in your discussions.”

    Yes it is an assumption but not wrong assumption. I don’t know exactly the reason, however, the first thing that propels things to create and experience is desire. This is what Buddhists also believe.

    “You have started with – “soul is infinite, all knowing, etc.” So, you have God in mind. You won’t be able solve any problem when you are with God. Where did you find that soul is all knowing? Soul is infinite? How do you know God exists? You cannot know, because nobody has answered that question, except Bible. Bible says “God is spirit”, but you do not try to understand that. Bible says sow-reap, but you do not try understand that either.”

    The problem begins when you deny that God exist. Without a First Cause there could be no Second Cause and so on.

    How do I know that God exists? Because infinite exists in order to create the finite. You say that you agree that God is spirit but on the other hand you say that there is no God. Let me ask you a question. Do you believe that the infinite exists? If yes then that’s what I mean by God, not some man in the sky.

    Since God exists and is infinite therefore soul is part of God and therefore infinite. Most people when they talk about soul they usually talk about the astral planes. Astral planes are finite and astral beings are having births and deaths. On the other hand, soul is part of God or what the Buddhists call Nirvana. The highest priniciple, the unborn and the undying.

    I cannot understand many things. Few people can understand many things.

    “Unless you go to the root of everything by asking a series of questions, you will not know what your assumptions are? But every time we have seen that you are assuming existence of God or freewill, violating your Bible.”

    I don’t believe in free will anymore. It doesn’t make sense. I believe in theological determinism. The Bible was written by men with higher perception than most of us, however, many books, especially the Gnostic ones, were left out for political reasons.

    Like

    1. There are two definitions of God. Do you realize that? Christianity Definition (CD) – God is the creator of the universe. Bible Definition (BD) – God is your soul.

      When you use CD you are denying your Bible. I am always using BD. If you use CD you will always create confusions and contradictions. You are saying God is infinite and then you are saying Infinite is God. It is a circular logic. It is not a proof. You cannot prove infinity. Therefore there is no proof of CD. Nobody has any proof for CD. You have watched many videos between experts on atheist and theists; they are all confused, because they are using CD. Christianity is wrong, and Bible is correct.

      BD has proof. I have given many proofs of BD in the book and to you also. Follow Bible then you will have all answers correctly, in a consistent and meaningful way.

      Like

      1. You are making a huge mistake. Christianity is not one thing. Christianity has many sects and different from one another. Personally, I am Greco-Christian Gnostic. Gnosticism is considered a heresy by the official church, however, mainline believers are pretty good and tolerant. Extremists are threatening and ignorant.

        What you in USA know about Christianity are some extremist Judeo-Christian sects. These sects believe that the Jewish tribal deity is the only God and they want everyone else to be tormented in hell.

        Infinity is not “proof”. Infinity is an axiom.

        Like

        1. Whatever the sect is, I will call them as Christianity, you can call them anything you like. It does not matter for me. All religions, including Hinduism, have a God, who is considered as creator and can change their lives. The other definition is from the religious books, like Bible, Vedas, etc., which are all same in terms of God. I did not discuss God and religions in this soul theory book. There is no God in Vedas. Most yogis do not talk about God also. This book is about soul theory. So the definitions remain same. You can change CD the way you like. But you cannot change BD.

          Using axioms you cannot do anything. Mathematics is based on axioms, which are nothing but assumptions. So, all your results will be assumptions and therefore false. That is why I say – all of science is wrong. You will never be able to prove anything using CD; you will remain irrational, confused, and contradictory, just like all atheist and theists are. They cannot prove the CD. On the other BD can prove everything in our life, show you the demonstrations also, just like Galileo did.

          Like

          1. “Whatever the sect is, I will call them as Christianity, you can call them anything you like. It does not matter for me.”

            The differences between the sects are chaotic. You cannot put all of them in the same basket.

            “All religions, including Hinduism, have a God, who is considered as creator and can change their lives.”

            Yes and I believe that also.

            “There is no God in Vedas.”

            Well, I haven’t read the Vedas but Hindus believe in God. The other guy said that there is God in the Vedas.

            “Using axioms you cannot do anything. Mathematics is based on axioms, which are nothing but assumptions. So, all your results will be assumptions and therefore false. That is why I say – all of science is wrong.”

            Again you are using generalizations. Mathematics is the most truthful of all sciences. Science is not wrong, scientism is wrong.

            “You will never be able to prove anything using CD; you will remain irrational, confused, and contradictory, just like all atheist and theists are. They cannot prove the CD.”

            We theists are not confused. We know what we are talking about. Atheists are confused because they don’t believe in the Infinite and therefore they don’t believe in objective truth and they have to invent theories like Darwinism, Marxism, Freudism, Nietzscheism, etc… in order to cover their ignorance and sound intelligent.

            Like

            1. “Science is not wrong,” – No, science is all wrong, since it is based on assumptions. This book proves that. Take a look at the Truth chapter. Assumptions can never become correct, no matter how you manipulate them. Same is true with CD, but never with BD.

              “We theists are not confused.” – If you cannot answer all questions then you are confused. Most important question is – prove that God exists. But nobody can. Your CD is an assumption. Therefore everything you say will be assumptions only, just like math and science.

              You have taken many subjects in many comment-chains in this book. We have always come to a point where you have eventually contradicted Bible. All cases led to the existence of freewill. Which not only contradicts sow-reap, it also contradicts destiny, and CD.

              Edgar Cayce said soul wants to grow and that is why it reincarnates. Eventually you said it reincarnates because it wants to. But you have failed to provide why it wants to. Then you said soul is infinite, and is God. Thus your God reincarnates, which contradicts Bible. Infinite is an assumption.

              Like

              1. Positive sciences and technological sciences are all correct. Historical sciences are controlled by cultural Marxists and Soros liberal, internationalist and materialist ideology.

                Theists are not confused. They are always asking questions because they love the truth. Theists believe in objective truth. God is not a thing to prove. God is beyond everything. You need to use your intuition to find Him. My Christian definition is not wrong.

                The problem of free will. Even if free will doesn’t exist, this doesn’t mean that God is not real.

                Edgar Cayce is correct. Growth is not a black and white thing. Growth is many, many, many things. It wants because It wants. I cannot know the will of the infinite because I am finite. In order to be all knowing and eternal I need to be in the Infinite Realm, the Kabbalah calls it Ein Sof and the Buddhists call it Paranirvana. The Unity of everything. The Infinite and Eternal Light.

                God doesn’t reincarnate but manifests. We as humans see it as reincarnation but the Supreme Being sees it as manifestation. Infinity is an axiom.

                Like

                1. “Positive sciences and technological sciences are all correct.” – Technology is correct, because it uses objects of nature, which are correct, or truths or real. But entire science is wrong, because they are all based on assumptions, which are wrong. Chapter one on TRUTH has many examples that show science is wrong. If you think, you are correct, take any one of them and then show it is correct.

                  “Infinity is an axiom.” – What is an axiom? Can you define it?

                  Like

                  1. Yeah but technology is science. Positive sciences are also correct. Mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology (observational biology not historical biology) are all correct.

                    An axiom or postulate is a statement that is taken to be true, to serve as a premise or starting point for further reasoning and arguments.

                    Like

                    1. “An axiom or postulate is a statement that is taken to be true,..” – No rational mind should accept anything like that without a proof of such statements. If you believe them then you will never find the truths. All words like {axiom, postulate, assumption, false, imagination, lying}, etc., are synonyms only. When money power imposes something on the society, they find some such complex words like postulate and exploit their ignorance to confuse the humanity. This is why Mark Twain said – “Majority is always in the wrong”. For the same reason Ayn Rand said – “Truth is not for all men”. You have to learn to ask a chain of questions to find the truth.

                      Both straight line and real numbers are false, because they do not exist in nature. These two assumptions are in the foundations of mathematics. Therefore the entire mathematics is false and assumptions only. Engineering uses things of nature, nature is always true, therefore engineering cannot be false.

                      It is just like CD God, which is an assumption only. So all of religions are based on such false assumptions, and therefore religion itself must be false. Assumptions can never become correct. Otherwise it will never be called assumptions.

                      Like

    1. Edgar Cayce has talked about soul development also. Here are some examples from his quotes: “(1) Soul development should take precedence over all things. (2) The soul seeks growth. (3) There is progress whether you are going forward or backward.”

      I think in this book I have mentioned – once you are a yogi, you remain yogi in all your future incarnations. However, since you are guided by destiny, you will do only what is assigned for you.

      Like

      1. “Edgar Cayce has talked about soul development also. Here are some examples from his quotes: “(1) Soul development should take precedence over all things. (2) The soul seeks growth. (3) There is progress whether you are going forward or backward.””

        All these 3 premises are correct. Progress doesn’t always mean going from 1 to 2 or from 2 to 3 but everywhere to everywhere.

        “I think in this book I have mentioned – once you are a yogi, you remain yogi in all your future incarnations. However, since you are guided by destiny, you will do only what is assigned for you.”

        Since the soul is perfect, infinite and all knowing, I disagree. In one life you may be a yogi and in another a soldier, in another a carpenter, in another a thief, etc…

        Like

          1. Growth means experience. It is all knowing but It wants to experience Itself. It is like watching a match and playing a match. If you watch you know what the match is like but you cannot experience. In order to experience you need to play. For example, the soul asks what is it like to be for example, Leonardo Da Vinci, Lady Gaga, St Patrick or Ashurbanipal? And here is the answer!

            Like

                1. “Because It can. Because It wants to play.” – How come it can? Why it wants to play? Keep asking such questions like this, and keep giving me answers, and let me know how far you can go. Or tell me when you want to stop and why?

                  Like

                  1. Why does It play? Because It wants. Desire is the first thing. What do you do if you want a sandwich? You go and get it. The same thing is with the soul. It wants to experience Itself. It is infinite and wants to experience the finite. It is like the river. Now why It wants to play? Because It just wants. You cannot go ad infinitum on this. It wants because It wants. Desire is the first thing. Everything comes from desire. Your beginning and your end should be desire. If you go beyond and ask more and more questions you will not find answers and will resort to nihilism and become insane.

                    Like

                    1. “It wants because It wants.” – You can see that you do not have the answer. You do not recognize that you have an assumption. You think you can do something without any reasons. That is you are saying: reason-action, cause-effect, sow-reap, action-reaction, etc., are meaningless. You will always fail to provide rationality on every subject you take, if you believe in freewill or God etc. This is probably the number seventh subject in your discussions.

                      You have started with – “soul is infinite, all knowing, etc.” So, you have God in mind. You won’t be able solve any problem when you are with God. Where did you find that soul is all knowing? Soul is infinite? How do you know God exists? You cannot know, because nobody has answered that question, except Bible. Bible says “God is spirit”, but you do not try to understand that. Bible says sow-reap, but you do not try understand that either.

                      Unless you go to the root of everything by asking a series of questions, you will not know what your assumptions are? But every time we have seen that you are assuming existence of God or freewill, violating your Bible.

                      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s