1C:Sab Jhut Hai

theories have to be wrong. Observe that you can get the same results in nature for many reasons. But the results will not prove the theory. The theory will be proven only when its assumptions are proven.

However, engineering cannot make assumptions, because engineering products are made from objects of nature and these products interact with nature also. Thus engineering is part of nature and therefore must automatically obey all the laws of nature. This same thing cannot be said for physics and mathematics. Engineering and nature will automatically reject all assumptions and therefore no science theory can work for engineering and nature.

Thus 99% of the teachers are teaching wrong theories to us. They do not know that they are teaching wrong subjects or wrong theories. Only 1% of these teachers know that these theories are all wrong. This 1% has occasionally written about it in their books and other research papers. However, if you are not looking for such truths, you will never find them. And you will never know that the things you have learnt are all wrong.

When professor Quigley says, education is designed not to find the truth, he is exactly correct. Math and Science are completely wrong. You do not have to know math and science to know that they are wrong; all you have to know is that (a) they make assumptions and (b) nature cannot make assumptions. Note that by science, we generally mean physics only. However, excepting some branches of science which are like engineering, such as, chemistry, medical surgery, cooking, etc., all other branches are false.

8.  No Infinity

Infinity is associated with mass, length, and time of an object or among objects. Every object has a mass; like sun, moon, earth, a galaxy, a human being, a tree, a plant, a dog etc. All these objects have a finite mass. Their masses can never be infinity.

Similarly all these objects have volume, length, and height. These parameters of an object are also finite. No object has infinite length. Every object also has a finite life time. It goes through a birth process, maturity process, and then death process. This is true for all living and nonliving objects. Scientists have discovered that stars also die. Every society, nation, civilization also dies. Thus life and therefore time is always finite.

The distance between two objects is never infinite. The distance between two galaxies is always finite. Similarly time to travel from one galaxy to another galaxy is finite. These values can be very large but never infinity.

Infinity is an assumption. Large number is never an approximation for infinity. Things dramatically change when we change the infinity assumption to a finite number, small or large. Thus if we describe nature using infinity we will make error and will never find the truth. Mathematics is full of assumptions of infinity. Therefore mathematics can never be correct for a description of nature.

There are some widely used theories called Laplace Transforms [Dunn], Fourier Transforms etc., which are defined using infinity. These theories cannot be valid for engineering [Das, 2009-2], because they use infinity, which is an invalid assumption for nature.

Physics and engineering use those two transforms quite extensively in developing many other theories. Therefore all those theories have to be wrong both in practices of engineering and in describing the laws of nature. Fourier Transform [Das, 2009-1] is used in Sampling theorem, Capacity theorem, Uncertainty principle, etc. Therefore all of them are wrong. Laplace transform [Das, 2011-1] is very heavily used in control system engineering, communication engineering particularly in under graduate courses. Therefore these subjects are false and cannot work in real life engineering.

If something is applied in engineering, do not assume that the thing is working, just because engineering is working. Engineering works because of redundancies, safety and failure monitoring, crash and reset implementations using watch dog timers etc. Lot of electronic computers are placed together to make things work using many checks and balances. Even then we see most engineering do not work. How many times your computer crashes, how many times your car breaks down, how often kitchen faucet leaks?

We will illustrate with examples, from physics and from mathematics to show that our education indeed does not teach the truth. It is true for all subjects. Carroll Quigley’s book shows that history and economics that we teach are all wrong. Of course, those two are theoretical subjects and do not claim to describe nature. They are used mainly to control and brainwash people. But here we will see that even mathematics and physics are used to brainwash people and to keep them away from real truth about nature and its laws.

9. Sab Jhut Hai

In a novel, Tagore, a Bengali Nobel Laureate poet, said “Sab jhut hai” in Hindi; which means everything is false. Many western philosophers also said the same thing. For example Mark Twain said – “Majority is always in the wrong”. To illustrate the point, in the following subsections we describe few widely used subjects and tools which are completely wrong.

9.1   Laplace Transform

Laplace transform is a mathematical theory that uses infinity in its definition. Infinity is invalid in nature and therefore this theory cannot be used in engineering. Yet we are extensively using this theory in many engineering applications. As a result none of these engineering projects work. Engineers use lot of patches and kludges to make them work, the products become unreliable, i.e. unstable and unpredictable.

Large number is never an approximation for infinity. Infinity is an assumption. If we replace infinity by a large or small number the theory dramatically changes its characteristics. Thus entire engineering, where we use Laplace transform, must be rewritten. More details are given below.

Infinite Laplace Transform (ILT)

Laplace Transform (LT) is defined using an integral as shown in (1.1):

nature’s engineering work. We do not use any theory when we walk, or when we do our daily activities. This happens because we have the best sensor technology inside our body. The same can be done for engineering also [Das, 2012-2].

9.2  Newton’s First Law

Here is an example from physics that also fails to provide any truth. This theory is stated in the following way in the physics book [Serway, p.114]:

“In the absence of external forces and when viewed from an inertial reference frame, an object at rest remains at rest and an object in motion continues in motion with a constant velocity (that is, with a constant speed in a straight line)”.

We are considering here only the dynamic motion part of the theory. We can break the above statement in some smaller statements to show its assumptions and results parts:

  • In the absence of external forces and when viewed from an inertial reference frame,
  • an object in motion continues in motion with a constant velocity (that is, with a constant speed in a straight line)

The part (a) is the assumption. The part (b) is the result. Part (b) will hold good only when part (a) holds. But we know that part (a) cannot hold. That is so because nature cannot make any assumptions. There is no place in the universe or on the surface of earth where there is no external force. Gravitational forces, besides other forces, are always there everywhere. Thus (a) is invalid and therefore Newton’s first law cannot be called a law of nature. This law violates the statements of the simultaneity law.

Let us look at the result (b) now, which says an object will move in a straight line with a constant speed. Have you ever seen any object on earth moving in a straight line with a constant speed? No, never! This does not even happen in deep space. Thus this law, the first law of Newton, is completely wrong.

The following statements can be found in a physics textbook [Ferraro, p. 8] about the Newton’s first law:

“We could hardly sustain that this principle [First law] is a strict experimental result. On the one hand it is not evident how to recognize whether a body is free of forces or not. Even if a unique body in the universe were thought, it is undoubted that its movement could not be rectilinear and uniform in every reference system.”

In fact all three laws of Newton assume the same isolated environment assumptions. Therefore none of them can have any truth. Surprisingly, most of our research work is done in an isolated environment, inside laboratory, eliminating nature and its impact on the subjects.  How can we then find the truth about nature?

If we want to study earth, we cannot take the earth out of its orbit and analyze it. Out of its orbit, earth will no longer be earth. Its atmosphere will be gone, all animals will die. It will do no good to our investigation. Imagine then what we can expect when we take an electron out of its orbit. It will not be an electron anymore. I am a completely different person when I am outside my home. So is everyone else. Isolated environment is wrong, simultaneity law is correct.

This shows that our society or present civilization is not looking for truth. Professor Quigley was correct – education is not supposed to find the truth. And there is a very good reason for it – as we will discuss later when we investigate economics, money, money power, and the central bank. Again as a reminder, no one can avoid destiny law.

9.3 QM and SR

This book has a chapter on Quantum Mechanics (QM). We have already discussed about why this chapter cannot be correct. This is so because of its dependence on uncertainty principle, which in turn depends on Fourier Transform. We know that FT uses infinity, and infinity is not there in nature and engineering.

The Special Relativity (SR) similarly uses Newton’s first law as its assumption. SR requires an inertial reference frame. A physics textbook defines – “an inertial frame of reference as a frame in which an object obeys Newton’s first law: so that it travels at a constant velocity because no external force acts on it.” Thus SR depends on Newton’s first law, which we know is not a correct theory as discussed before. SR also assumes light’s speed is constant, which has not been verified by any observations. Many experiments, on the contrary, prove that constancy is not correct in nature. Search for this author’s paper on Michelson and Morley experiment.

9.4 GPS Engineering

Kepler’s theory is considered as a law of nature in physics. It says satellites go around earth in an elliptic path. The law also gives a mathematical formula to find the position of the satellite at any time.

Clearly this law cannot be correct. Earth is not stationary, it is moving around the sun. So, you cannot have an elliptic path around the earth. Ellipse can be drawn only on the plane of a paper. Sun is also not stationary; it is moving inside a spiral of our galaxy, and that spiral is going around the core of our galaxy. Our galaxy is also moving in the space of the universe. Thus the path of the satellite is a very complex path in the 3D space of the universe, which is beyond comprehension by any human brain. And indeed Kepler’s law has completely failed in GPS (Global Positioning System).

Engineers, physicists, and mathematicians of GPS research groups modified Kepler’s law significantly, but still could not make it work. Engineers finally decided to make actual measurements of satellite’s position from the ground stations and then upload that data to satellites for rebroadcasting to our handheld receivers.

This is done nearly every two hours to make GPS work and maintain the desired accuracy. This is how we add patches and kludges in all engineering projects, because we are forced to use false theories. Engineering works, but that does not mean that the theories work.

Again, this is a consequence of destiny law, nobody has freewill, and nobody can change anything, unless that is written in the destiny.

Why did Kepler fail? Because, like all physicists, and unlike Galileo, Kepler did not observe nature, he made assumptions, he used math, etc. Science without observations of nature has to be false. Science with assumptions cannot have any foundation. Analyze any science theory, and you will find it has assumptions.

10. Conclusions

We have extracted the definition of truth from the Vedas and have shown with many examples that the definition is equally meaningful for Bible also. We have also found that the global destiny is the highest level truth. Nobody has any freewill, and we always obey our individual destiny, which is derived from the global destiny of the universe. Destiny law is not fatalistic, because you cannot sit idle, unless it is written in your destiny. All judgments and punishments, even though they may be wrong, are part of the global destiny.

Unfortunately, on our earth, and in this era of our civilization, we do not have anything that represents the truth. Thus everything we know and do is all wrong or false, according to the above definition of truth. Again, this is a consequence of the destiny law too. We cannot fix these problems because we do not have freewill. We know money-less economy (MLE) can solve all problems, eliminate all false things, and bring us to the path of truth, but we cannot implement MLE and we must wait for the destined time and event. We are indeed helpless. But we are not our physical bodies, we are our souls, and guided by the global destiny.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s